Tumorendoprothetik

Abstract

Due to demographic aging, an increasing number of revision arthroplasty procedures is expected during upcoming years. While the use of a megaprosthesis for bone reconstruction after tumor resection is gold standard, this type of prosthesis still meets with reservation in the field of revision arthroplasty because of numerous risk factors. The purpose of this article is to present the importance of modular megaprostheses in revision arthroplasty, taking into consideration the risks of periprosthetic infection, aseptic loosening, material failure, and hip dislocation. Because of improvements in the field of megaprostheses during the last 30 years, the risks after implantation of this type of prosthesis have significantly decreased. The risk of periprosthetic infection has been reduced about 1/3 by the use of silver surface coating. Improvements in stem design, cement technique, and the additional use of locking screws have minimized the risk of aseptic loosening. Improvements in material composition have reduced the risk of material failure. The risk of hip dislocation could also be minimized by careful tissue preparation and appropriate suture technique. There is no need for the conservative use of megaprostheses in revision arthroplasty. There are many benefits in the use of megaprostheses in multimorbid patients (i.e., reduced operating time, the possibility of early full weight bearing, and a reduced risk of periprosthetic infection by the use of silver surface coating) instead of complex bone reconstruction during revision arthroplasty.