Abstract

IntroductionRadiography is an unreliable and insensitive tool for the assessment of structural lesions in the sacroiliac joints (SIJ). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detects a wider spectrum of structural lesions but has undergone minimal validation in prospective studies. The Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) Structural Score (SSS) assesses a spectrum of structural lesions (erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill, ankylosis) and its potential to discriminate between therapies requires evaluation.MethodsThe SSS score assesses five consecutive coronal slices through the cartilaginous portion of the joint on T1-weighted sequences starting from the transitional slice between cartilaginous and ligamentous portions of the joint. Lesions are scored dichotomously (present/absent) in SIJ quadrants (fat metaplasia, erosion) or halves (backfill, ankylosis). Two readers independently scored 147 pairs (baseline, 2 years) of scans from a prospective cohort of patients with SpA who received either standard (n = 69) or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitor (n = 78) therapy. Smallest detectable change (SDC) was calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA), discrimination was assessed using Guyatt’s effect size, and treatment group differences were assessed using t-tests and the Mann–Whitney test. We identified baseline demographic and structural damage variables associated with change in SSS score by univariate analysis and analyzed the effect of treatment by multivariate stepwise regression adjusted for severity of baseline structural damage and demographic variables.ResultsA significant increase in mean SSS score for fat metaplasia (P = 0.017) and decrease in mean SSS score for erosion (P = 0.017) was noted in anti-TNFα treated patients compared to those on standard therapy. Effect size for this change in SSS fat metaplasia and erosion score was moderate (0.5 and 0.6, respectively). Treatment and baseline SSS score for erosion were independently associated with change in SSS erosion score (β = 1.75, P = 0.003 and β = 0.40, P < 0.0001, respectively). Change in ASDAS (β = −0.46, P = 0.006), SPARCC MRI SIJ inflammation (β = −0.077, P = 0.019), and baseline SSS score for fat metaplasia (β = 0.085, P = 0.034) were independently associated with new fat metaplasia.ConclusionThe SPARCC SSS method for assessment of structural lesions has discriminative capacity in demonstrating significantly greater reduction in erosion and new fat metaplasia in patients receiving anti-TNFα therapy.

Highlights

  • Radiography is an unreliable and insensitive tool for the assessment of structural lesions in the sacroiliac joints (SIJ)

  • Fat metaplasia is not observed on radiography and the histopathology of this lesion is unknown, but it is frequently observed in SIJs and at spinal locations that are typical for inflammation; that is, vertebral corners, adjacent to vertebral endplates, facet and costo-vertebral joints [4]

  • If treatment group differences for change in specific structural lesion scores were significant in group analyses, we explored the potential impact of baseline differences between treatment groups on change in Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score (SSS) by analyzing variables related to demographics and disease severity (SSS for erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill, ankylosis) using univariate regression, with a significant interaction defined as P ≤ 0.10

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Radiography is an unreliable and insensitive tool for the assessment of structural lesions in the sacroiliac joints (SIJ). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents a substantial advance in the field due to its ability to visualize inflammation in soft tissue as well as subchondral bone. This is evident on fat-suppressed sequences such as short tau inversion recovery. We have previously hypothesized that resolution of inflammation in erosions is followed by development of a new tissue, which on T1WSE MRI has the same signal intensity as fat metaplasia [5] We have called this type of lesion backfill due to its appearance in the cavity of the erosion, whereas the term fat metaplasia is used when this lesion is located in the bone marrow

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.