Étude rétrospective et comparative de l’impact de la crise sanitaire sur l’activité d’une unité d’urgence pédopsychiatrique

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of this retrospective study was to question the psychological consequences of the health crisis in a pediatric population, through an analysis of the variations in the activity data of a pedopsychiatric emergency consultation service. Materials and methodsThe present study is a retrospective and comparative epidemiological study based on an analysis of activity data from a pedopsychiatric emergency consultation at the Lille University Hospital center collected over the period contemporary of the social restriction measures of March 17th, 2020 to May 19th, 2021 as well as those collected after the lifting of these measures from May 19th, 2021 to May 31st, 2022 by comparing them to the activity on this same service over the equivalent periods between January 1st, 2017 and March 17th, 2020. Comparisons centered around the three confinement periods were also carried out. Any patient between 0 and 18 years old taken care of in this emergency consultation was included in this study. ResultsA significant increase in drug prescriptions and consultations for suicidal ideations was observed during, but also at a distance from social restriction measures. The first confinement was marked by a significant drop in the number of consultations and a significant increase in the drafting of child protection documents. DiscussionThese results were therefore in favor of an increase in suicidality in the pediatric population during and after the lifting of social restriction measures, as well as an increase in situations relating to child protection during the first confinement. The significant increase in discordant discharge drug prescriptions with the more modest increase in hospitalizations foreshadowed a mismatch between needs and hospitalization capacity. ConclusionAn impact of the health crisis could therefore be observed on the activity of a pedopsychiatric emergency consultation during, but also after the lifting of social restriction measures. This raises the importance of not limiting research to periods of confinement, as well as the question of the reversibility of the variations observed for the generation considered.