Abstract

Abstract Aims To compare the trust-wide performance with the standard by the British Association of Day Surgery in the management of cholecystectomy Methods 4 months of Electronic data of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 2020 was analyzed. Those who had emergency cholecystectomy were excluded. Results 112 of 145 total patients were female and 33 were male. The age range was 18–82 Around 65% of patients were sent home the same day. 51 Patients ended up being admitted. 33 of these were Pre-booked as inpatients' intent. 39% (13/33) had no specific reason for being booked as an inpatient. The rest Majority had medical issues quoted as the reason for booking.35% (18) of the 51 admitted patients were actually brought in as day-case lap-chole. 6 of these were admitted for perioperative surgical issues and 8 had no documented reason. The Mean length of stay was 2.56 days(0–13). Our Performance was noted to be 10% lower than the BADS standard. Conclusion Relatively more patients are being treated as inpatients than the recommended standard. About 1/4th of those who were inpatient had no specific/genuine grounds to be kept in. There is a need for improvement in pre and perioperative documentation to explain the reason for inpatient management. Development of inpatient surgery booking criteria and adherence to set criteria.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call