TU2.9 Under-investigation of iron deficiency anaemia in QFIT-negative suspected colorectal cancer patients

Abstract

Abstract Introduction QFIT (Quantitative faecal immunochemical testing) has become the first-line screening tool for suspected colorectal cancer due to a lower risk profile, higher sensitivity and specificity than routine colonoscopy and faecal occult blood testing. Patients with QFIT measurements <10micrograms/ml are considered unlikely to have colorectal cancer and may be discharged from the 2-week wait (2WW) pathway without further investigations, in the absence of other concerning features including iron deficiency anaemia (IDA). We present our findings on the under-investigation of IDA in a cohort of QFIT-negative patients. Method We collected data on 100 patients in a district general hospital, referred via the 2WW suspected colorectal cancer pathway with QFIT measured as <10 micrograms/ml, over a 2-month period. Our data-points included whether iron, ferritin and haemoglobin were measured in the 6months preceding QFIT measurement. Results Our patients included 67 females and 33 males, with a median age of 67.5. 32 out of 100 patients underwent neither iron nor ferritin blood tests; 21 of which did not have their haemoglobin measured either. 25 out of 100 patients underwent iron, ferritin and haemoglobin blood tests in the specified time period. Discussion Failure to investigate IDA in QFIT-negative suspected colorectal cancer patients increases the risk of missed pathology. Studies have found patients with right sided colon cancer sometimes have false negative QFIT results but often present with IDA. We propose that mandatory investigation of IDA is incorporated into existing 2WW suspected colorectal cancer pathways, alongside QFIT measurement, to mitigate this risk.