Abstract

Adam Morton (1997) challenges me to say more in defence of my claim (1995, p. 295, p. 319; 1991a, pp. 206-7) that the Gibbard phenomenon can apply to counterfactuals. He gives reasons for doubting that I am correct. I was brief and inexplicit on this point. Before turning to Morton's argument, I shall say something about the phenomenon, why it matters, how I attempted to explain it and what I took to follow about its scope.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.