Abstract
This chapter is about the way in which conceptions of truth and reality are articulated and contained in family law, specifically in contexts in which the meaning of knowing comes into question. It explores the idea that there can, and could be, a space between conceptions of truth and reality, and that family law might need to articulate an account of what this means and entails. The question is inspired by what is, to my mind, one of the most provocative and interesting lines in John Eekelaar’s book, Family Law and Personal Life : the line that ‘in general it is better to confront the world as we have made it than pretend it is otherwise’. The normative dimension and practical implications of this claim have generated much debate in the literature. What I would like to consider here, however, is what it would mean to inhabit the spaces that are implied in this statement. What would it mean to ‘confront the world as we have made it’, to ‘pretend it is otherwise’, or to be somewhere in-between? What would it mean to know, in these spaces?
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
