Abstract

Many Indigenous people have a deep mistrust of research, with some describing research as one of the “dirtiest” words in Indigenous language. The histories and experiences behind such mistrust are long and painful. Given what has been perceived as Indigenous objectification at the hands of largely Anglo-European others for research from which they fail to benefit, many communities now refuse research unless it is undertaken under certain, Indigenous-defined circumstances. Such refusal is a move away from others purposes and a move towards autonomy and self-determination. For some, this is a statement of sovereignty and it applies to all areas of endeavour, including the new frontiers of research and the structures that support them, such as datification of knowledge. This article examines data sovereignty from the perspective of Indigenous peoples. While data sovereignty has become a ubiquitous concern, Indigenous data sovereignty arises from contexts specific to Indigenous peoples. The focus of this article is to provide a brief overview of recent data sovereignty developments, along with the context that lies behind these activities. Through this examination, implications for trust in scholarly communications will be discussed.

Highlights

  • Frontiers in Research Metrics and AnalyticsGiven what has been perceived as Indigenous objectification at the hands of largely Anglo-European others for research from which they fail to benefit, many communities refuse research unless it is undertaken under certain, Indigenous-defined circumstances

  • Many Indigenous people have a deep mistrust of research, with some describing research as one of the “dirtiest” words in Indigenous language

  • That sovereignty is the word to describe a desired solution to the problems associated with data resonates with Indigenous people, not necessarily for the reasons found in others’ use of the word

Read more

Summary

Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics

Given what has been perceived as Indigenous objectification at the hands of largely Anglo-European others for research from which they fail to benefit, many communities refuse research unless it is undertaken under certain, Indigenous-defined circumstances. Such refusal is a move away from others purposes and a move towards autonomy and self-determination. The focus of this article is to provide a brief overview of recent data sovereignty developments, along with the context that lies behind these activities Through this examination, implications for trust in scholarly communications will be discussed

INTRODUCTION
Colonialism and Sovereignty
Colonialism and Research
Findings
Administrative Data
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.