Abstract

This is a paper about trust, with a specific focus on the ways in which trust is investigated in the business literature and the commercial sector. The lens through which the topic is approached is distinctively philosophical. We use philosophical tools to demonstrate the paucity of some of the accounts of trust that are given in the business and management literature, as well as the empirically informed literature that has flowed from them. We close with a discussion of some work on trust drawn from the commercial sector that would, as we shall demonstrate, benefit from a clearer understanding of the nature of trust. We take this to be important. Trust is a key moral and ethical component of transactional relationships. Without a clear understanding of the notion, we will be missing a central concept in our attempts to understand the commercial world that we inhabit. The paper proceeds in four parts. In the first part of the paper we introduce some reasonably standard philosophical distinctions between different kinds of trust, as well as saying a little more about our methods. In the second, we demonstrate that a reasonably widely held account of trust in the business and management literature fails to capture the nuance reflected by the philosophical literature. On the basis of this, in the third section, we suggest that various pieces of empirical work require reassessment. In the final part of the paper we explore some non-academic discussions of trust drawn from the commercial sector arguing that, there too, we require a more precise understanding of trust. In short, though, our overarching argument is simply this: if we can give a more precise analysis of trust, it follows that both our empirical research and current commercial activity can be improved.

Highlights

  • Philosophy of Management (2020) 19:3–19. This is a paper about trust, with a specific focus on the ways in which trust is investigated in the business literature and the commercial sector

  • We demonstrate that some reasonably widely held accounts of trust in the business and management literature fail to capture the nuance reflected by the philosophical literature, through the use of counterexamples

  • In the final part of the paper we explore some non-academic discussions of trust drawn from the commercial sector arguing that, there too, we require a more precise understanding of trust

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This is a paper about trust, with a specific focus on the ways in which trust is investigated in the business literature and the commercial sector. We use philosophical tools to demonstrate the paucity of some of the accounts of trust that are given in the business and management literature, as well as the empirically informed literature that has flowed from them. We demonstrate that some reasonably widely held accounts of trust in the business and management literature fail to capture the nuance reflected by the philosophical literature, through the use of counterexamples. Though, our overarching argument is this: if we can give a more precise analysis of trust, it follows that both our empirical research and current commercial activity can be improved. Without a clear understanding of the notion, we will be missing a central concept in our attempts to understand the commercial world that we inhabit

Trust in Philosophy
Trust in the Management Literature
Other Options
Long and Sitkin
Empirical Work
Why Does this Matter Outside Academia?
Conclusions
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call