Abstract

Digital inclinometer applications using data from embedded sensors on smartphone/multi-purpose pocket computers or "smart digital inclinometers" (SDIs) are now used to clinically assess range of motion (ROM). The objectives of this study were to assess, compared with a biomechanical gold standard (GS), the trueness and minimal detectable change (MDC) of shoulder range of motion (SROM) measurements obtained from an SDI. Twenty-five (n = 25) asymptomatic healthy participants performed three trials of shoulder flexion (SF), shoulder abduction (SA), and shoulder external rotation (SER) at full-range and mid-range. SROM was measured concurrently from sensor data (pitch, yaw, roll angles) from an iPod Touch installed on the posterior aspect of the humerus and 3D orientation of the upper arm obtained from an optical motion tracking system GS. The mean level of bias between SDI and the GS across all SROM measurements was 3.4°, with a 95% confidence interval varying between -8.9° and 15.8°. The mean and standard deviation absolute difference of SDI measurements with the GS were 5.8° ± 3.7° for SF, 8.7° ± 5.2° for SA, and 1.7° ± 1.4° for SER. The trueness of these values varied according to the movement. MDC was 1.9° for SF, 2° for SA, and 0.3° for SER. SROM measures in SER with an SDI seem to be accurate and robust for clinical use. However, SROM measures in other planes of motion should be interpreted with caution depending on the evaluation objective, the plane of motion assessed, and the range of ROM measured.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call