Tropomyosin is no accurate marker allergen for diagnosis of shrimp allergy in Central Europe.

Abstract

AllergyEarly View LETTEROpen Access Tropomyosin is no accurate marker allergen for diagnosis of shrimp allergy in Central Europe João Grilo, João Grilo Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaSearch for more papers by this authorUte Vollmann, Ute Vollmann Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaSearch for more papers by this authorMartina Aumayr, Martina Aumayr MacroArray Diagnostics, Vienna, AustriaSearch for more papers by this authorGunter J. Sturm, Gunter J. Sturm Allergy Outpatient Clinic Reumannplatz, Vienna, Austria Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaSearch for more papers by this authorBarbara Bohle, Corresponding Author Barbara Bohle barbara.bohle@meduniwien.ac.at orcid.org/0000-0002-5105-7985 Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Correspondence Barbara Bohle, Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. Email: barbara.bohle@meduniwien.ac.atSearch for more papers by this author João Grilo, João Grilo Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaSearch for more papers by this authorUte Vollmann, Ute Vollmann Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaSearch for more papers by this authorMartina Aumayr, Martina Aumayr MacroArray Diagnostics, Vienna, AustriaSearch for more papers by this authorGunter J. Sturm, Gunter J. Sturm Allergy Outpatient Clinic Reumannplatz, Vienna, Austria Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaSearch for more papers by this authorBarbara Bohle, Corresponding Author Barbara Bohle barbara.bohle@meduniwien.ac.at orcid.org/0000-0002-5105-7985 Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Correspondence Barbara Bohle, Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. Email: barbara.bohle@meduniwien.ac.atSearch for more papers by this author First published: 24 March 2022 https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15290 Gunter J. Sturm and Barbara Bohle contributed equally AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat To the Editor, Crustacea shrimp is a frequent cause of food allergy with symptoms ranging from mild oral reactions to severe anaphylaxis. Shrimp contains the single major allergen tropomyosin (TM), which is also present in several invertebrates, for example, house dust mites (HDM). In fact, shrimp allergy has initially been considered to result from IgE-cross-reactivity following sensitization to Der p 10, the TM from Dermatophagoides pteronissimus. Because TM-specific IgE was found to be a good predictor of shrimp allergy in HDM-allergic individuals,1 singleplex assays with shrimp TM found their way into serological routine diagnosis. However, evidence accumulated that additional allergens cause shrimp allergy and cross-reactivity with HDM, such as arginine kinase (AK), myosin light chain (MLC), sarcoplasmic calcium-binding protein (SCBP), hemocyanin (HC), triose-phosphatase-isomerase (TPI), and troponin C (TC).2 Here, samples from 79 individuals who experienced allergic reactions to shrimps and displayed shrimp-specific IgE in ImmunoCAP (Table S1) were tested after approval by the ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna (EK 1344/2018) and informed consent for IgE reactivity to recombinant allergens from Penaeus monodon and Crangon crangon in the newly developed Allergy Explorer-ALEX 2® and by immunoblotting to proteins extracted from Litopenaeus vannamei, a species frequently consumed in Austria, for example, as “cocktail shrimps” (for details see Appendix S1). The macroarray revealed that 42% of the patients displayed IgE to Pen m 1 (TM, 19% exclusively), 20% to Pen m 2 (AK, 3.7% exclusively), 10% to Pen m 3 (MLC, 2.5% exclusively), and 11% to Cra c 6 (TC), and matched IgE-profiles determined by immunoblotting (Figure 1 and Table S2). Thus, TM represented no major allergen in this cohort. Notably, 30% of the patients recognized Pen m 4 and 16% showed exclusive IgE reactivity to this SCBP with confirmed clinical relevance.3 Therefore, we consider Pen m 4 as important as Pen m 1 for the diagnosis of shrimp allergy in Central Europe. This conclusion is in line with previous studies.3-5 FIGURE 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint IgE-profiling of 79 shrimp-allergic individuals. IgE reactivity to Litopenaeus vannamei extract in immunoblot is shown in the upper panel. IgE reactivity to chip-spotted allergens is represented as dark boxes in the lower panel; BC, buffer control, NC, non-allergic control; kDa, kilo Dalton; detailed methodological information is provided in the online supplement In accordance with a strong association of shrimp and HDM allergy found by others,6 75% of our patients were sensitized to HDM among who 54% reacted with Pen m 1, 27% with Pen m 2, 17% with Pen m 4, 14% with Cra c 6, and 10% with Pen m 3 (Table S2). Thus, Pen m 1 was the major allergen but no sole diagnostic marker of shrimp allergy as previously reported for Italian HDM-allergic patients.6 We found no correlation of IgE levels specific for extracts from shrimp and HDM (R = .238, p = .072) and for HDM and Pen m 1 (R = .149, p = .216). Nevertheless, IgE levels for Pen m 1 and Der p 10 (R = .985, p < .001) and Pen m 2 and Der p 20 (R = .771, p < .001) correlated significantly. To confirm that additional allergens are required for an accurate serological diagnosis, we calculated the diagnostic sensitivity of Pen m 1 in combination with the other allergens (Table 1). All recombinant allergens together achieved a sensitivity of 68%. We expect that the inclusion of hemocyanin and ubiquitin might enhance this value as 10% and 9% of the patients recognized the corresponding proteins of 70 and 5–7 kDa, respectively, in the immunoblot (Figure 1). Hemocyanin was proposed to be relevant in the cross-reactivity of shrimps and mites and is mainly contained in the cephalothorax, but may be found in the abdominal muscle. As we employed shrimps without cephalothorax for extract preparation, our results underestimate the frequency of hemocyanin recognition. TABLE 1. IgE recognition of recombinant shrimp allergens of 59 HDM-sensitized patients (%) Pen m 1 54.2 Pen m 1 + Cra c 6 55.9 Pen m 1 + Pen m 3 57.6 Pen m 1 + Pen m 4 59.3 Pen m 1 + Pen m 3 + Pen m 4 59.3 Pen m 1 + Pen m 3 + Cra c 6 59.3 Pen m 1 + Pen m 4 + Cra c 6 61.0 Pen m 1 + Pen m 2 62.7 Pen m 1 + Pen m 2 + Cra c 6 62.7 Pen m 1 + Pen m 2 + Pen m 4 64.4 Pen m 1 + Pen m 2 + Pen m 4 + Cra c 6 64.4 Pen m 1 + Pen m 3 + Pen m 4 + Cra c 6 64.4 Pen m 1 + Pen m 2 + Pen m 3 66.1 Pen m 1 + Pen m 2 + Pen m 3 + Cra c 6 66.1 Pen m 1 + Pen m 2 + Pen m 3 + Pen m 4 67.8 Pen m 1 + Pen m 2 + Pen m 3 + Pen m 4 + Cra c 6 67.8 The molecular diagnosis approaches combined here further confirm how variate the IgE recognition of shrimp allergens can be, independently of whether patients are sensitized to HDM or not. This study shall raise awareness that TM is no accurate sole marker allergen for the serological diagnosis of shrimp allergy in HDM-sensitized patients. Funding information This study was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), projects W1248, P32953, and I4437, the Austrian Jubiläumsfond, project ÖNB17947, and by the Danube Allergy Research Cluster, Country of Lower Austria, and Medical University of Vienna, Austria. CONFLICT OF INTEREST GJS reports grants and personal fees from ALK Abelló and personal fees from Novartis, Bencard, and Allergopharma, during the conduct of the study. BB reports grants from Austrian Science Funds, Austrian Jubiläumsfonds, and Medical University of Vienna, during the conduct of the study and personal fees from AllergenOnline outside the submitted work. MA is employed by MacroArray Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria. The other authors have nothing to declare. Supporting Information Filename Description all15290-sup-0001-AppS1.docxWord 2007 document , 55.4 KB App S1 Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. REFERENCES 1Gamez C, Sanchez-Garcia S, Ibanez MD, et al. Tropomyosin IgE-positive results are a good predictor of shrimp allergy. Allergy. 2011; 66(10): 1375- 1383. Wiley Online LibraryCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2Asero R, Pravettoni V, Scala E, Villalta D. House dust mite-shrimp allergen interrelationships. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020; 20(4): 9. CrossrefPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3Pascal M, Grishina G, Yang AC, et al. Molecular diagnosis of shrimp allergy: efficiency of several allergens to predict clinical reactivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015; 3(4): 521-+. CrossrefPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4Bauermeister K, Wangorsch A, Garoffo LP, et al. Generation of a comprehensive panel of crustacean allergens from the North Sea Shrimp Crangon crangon. Mol Immunol. 2011; 48(15–16): 1983- 1992. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5Faber MA, Pascal M, El Kharbouchi O, et al. Shellfish allergens: tropomyosin and beyond. Allergy. 2017; 72(6): 842- 848. Wiley Online LibraryCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6Celi G, Brusca I, Scala E, et al. House dust mite allergy and shrimp allergy: a complex interaction. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020; 52(5): 205- 209. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation