Abstract
This commentary aims to point out how the results of the TROPION-LUNG01 study stress the "positive aspects" of the results, specifically, the increase in PFS, but hardly mention the potential harm to patients with squamous histology and lacks information on binary data (progression-free / progression, alive/death) as per CONSORT guidelines. Here, we also remark on the need for adherence to CONSORT guidelines to inform on the absolute and relative risks of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT). We emphasize the need for further research to develop a framework of how oncologists might explain the differences between PFS and OS in simple terms for a lay audience to create a more thoughtful decision of patients to embark on any cancer treatment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.