Abstract
Australia’s northern-most tropical city of Darwin has a strong presence in the domestic and international touristic imagination as a tropical escape destination – a small city poised on the edge of outstanding natural beauty – yet in national cinematic representations Darwin is often presented as a frontier zone, whether these tropes are pivoted around culture or nature. I would like to take up this idea of the city of Darwin as special and distinctive in the national imaginary that is discernible in recent Australian cinema, an idea that I show extends to the city’s representation in theatre and literature. This paper performs a close textual reading of the city’s recent representation in two high profile Australian feature films, Charlie’s Country (Rolf de Heer, 2013) and Last Cab to Darwin (Jeremy Sims, 2015). These are films that employ compassionate, humanistic themes, each maintaining a strong focus on main characters who find themselves both marginalized and neglected within the broader mechanisms of Australian society: hence each film is simultaneously performing the secondary work of critiquing Australian culture. In both films, I show how the tropical city of Darwin operates as a space of difference, but unlike the contemporary tourism marketing that simplistically brands the region as a “site of desire”, here we find two unique critiques of Australian law and society that work to show the ethical frontiers of legislation and of human sovereignty.
Highlights
I n July 2007, the high-profile Australian film director Baz Luhrmann travelled to tropical Darwin with Fox Studios to shoot segments of his epic war filmAustralia (2007) set in the Northern Territory during World War II
I will perform a close textual reading of the city’s recent representation in two high profile Australian feature films, Charlie’s Country (Rolf de Heer, 2013) and Last Cab to Darwin (Jeremy Sims, 2015). These are films that employ compassionate, “humanistic” themes (Aveyard, Moran & Vieth, 2018, p.156), each maintaining a strong focus on main characters who find themselves both marginalized and neglected within the broader mechanisms of Australian society; each film is simultaneously performing the secondary work of critiquing Australian culture more broadly
The tropical city of Darwin does operate as a space of difference, but unlike the contemporary tourism marketing that simplistically brands the region as a “site of desire”, here we find two unique critiques of Australian law and society that work to show the ethical frontiers of legislation and even of human sovereignty
Summary
I n July 2007, the high-profile Australian film director Baz Luhrmann travelled to tropical Darwin with Fox Studios to shoot segments of his epic war film. Despite the capability of computergenerated imagery to create a staged version of the city – and it was certainly used to stage many of the spectacular attack scenes in Australia – Luhrmann chose to include what one might call an “authentic” or “real” representation of the city of Darwin in the film Part of his reasoning for this costly decision was the need to show off the distinctive appeal of the tropical city on screen to an international audience: to show an aspect of the city that was both “real” and “special”. While “regional” capital cities such as Hobart and Perth are infrequently depicted fictionally on the silver screen, Darwin is unique as a tropical city, carrying a potent range of cultural meanings that link the city to the nation’s policing of its northern borders, its regional multiculturalism and to constructs of national identity
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: eTropic: electronic journal of studies in the Tropics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.