Abstract
One of the unique contributions the National War Labor Board made to the growing body of data in the field of labor-management relations resulted from its experience as a tripartite organization. Under this arrangement representatives of labor, management, and the public were given equal voting strength on a board that had semicompulsive powers in regard to labor disputes. Although the Board relied on a no-strike, no-lockout pledge, and its orders were merely advisory to the President, the prospect of coercive action by the President in support of the orders virtually made the Board a tripartite compulsory arbitration tribunal. Prior to this time, tripartite boards, in labor relations or in general administration, had been confined largely to an advisory and voluntary role. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.)
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
