Abstract
[first paragraph of article] Potent and consistent P2Y12 receptor inhibition is associated with reduced risk of atherothrombotic events in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), but with inevitable increased risk of bleeding as demonstrated in TRITON and PLATO trials – a finding that is especially pertinent to the treatment of medically managed NSTE ACS patients, who typical have a greater burden of comorbidities that predispose to bleeding. Given the significant proportion of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE) ACS patients managed medically worldwide and the need to mitigate both ischemic and bleeding risks in this vulnerable, high-risk population, novel clinical trials are needed.
Highlights
Potent and consistent P2Y12 receptor inhibition is associated with reduced risk of atherothrombotic events in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), but with inevitable increased risk of bleeding as demonstrated in TRITON1 and PLATO2 trials – a finding that is especially pertinent to the treatment of medically managed non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE) ACS patients, who typical have a greater burden of comorbidities that predispose to bleeding
TRILOGY ACS is randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active control, event-driven trial, that was conducted to evaluate whether aspirin plus prasugrel is superior to aspirin plus clopidogrel for long-term therapy in patients with unstable angina (UA) or NSTEMI who are treated medically without revascularization
The difference in treatment effect between the first 12 months and subsequent months was tested in a post hoc analysis using a time-dependent Cox proportional-hazards model; in this analysis, the time period and the interaction between the time period and treatment were time dependent factors
Summary
TRILOGY ACS is randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active control, event-driven trial, that was conducted to evaluate whether aspirin plus prasugrel is superior to aspirin plus clopidogrel for long-term therapy in patients with unstable angina (UA) or NSTEMI who are treated medically without revascularization. RESULTS Regarding efficacy; at 30 months, there was no significant between group difference in the rate of the primary end point
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
