Trifecta outcomes of modified robot-assisted simple enucleation and standard robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for treating clinical T1b renal cell carcinoma.

Abstract

BackgroundTo compare perioperative outcomes and Trifecta achievement of modified robot-assisted simple enucleation (MRASE) with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for treating clinical T1b renal tumors.MethodsWe analyzed 203 patients who underwent MRASE or RAPN for clinical T1b renal tumors at our institution from September 2014 to June 2018. The two groups were compared regarding perioperative outcome variables. Trifecta was defined as no perioperative complications, negative surgical margin, and ischemia time ≤25 minutes.ResultsIn all, 139 patients underwent MRASE and 64 underwent RAPN respectively. Patients in the MRASE group had shorter operative time (197.7 vs. 215.6 min, P=0.039) and warm ischemic time (21.2 vs. 24.1 min, P=0.004) in comparison to the RAPN group. The groups were comparable in estimated blood loss (230.5 vs. 269.8 mL, P=0.259). Tumor bed suturing was performed with a significantly lower frequency in the MRASE group than in the RAPN group (11.5% vs. 90.6%, P<0.01). The incidence of perioperative complications was similar. The rate of positive surgical margins was similar in both groups (2.2% vs. 6.3%, P=0.284). Trifecta was achieved in 61.2% and 42.2% of MRASE and RAPN patients (P=0.012). On multivariable analysis, the type of procedure, RENAL score, estimated blood loss, and operative time were positive factors for the achievement of Trifecta.ConclusionsIn this series MRASE was superior to RAPN with regard to the achievement of Trifecta in treating T1b renal tumors. Besides, MRASE had better outcomes for shorter operative time, shorter warm ischemic time, and less need for tumor bed suturing as compared with RAPN.