Abstract

The Los Menucos locality in Patagonia, Argentina, bears a well-known ichnofauna mostly documented by small therapsid footprints. Within this ichnofauna, large pentadactyl footprints are also represented but to date were relatively underinvestigated. These footprints are here analyzed and discussed based on palaeobiological indications (i.e., trackmaker identification). High resolution digital photogrammetry method was performed to achieve a more objective representation of footprint three-dimensional morphologies. The footprints under study are compared with Pentasauropus from the Upper Triassic lower Elliot Formation (Stormberg Group) of the Karoo Basin (Lesotho, southern Africa). Some track features suggest a therapsid-grade synapsid as the potential trackmaker, to be sought among anomodont dicynodonts (probably Kannemeyeriiformes). While the interpretation of limb posture in the producer of Pentasauropus tracks from the Los Menucos locality agrees with those described from the dicynodont body fossil record, the autopodial posture does not completely agree. The relative distance between the impression of the digital (ungual) bases and the distal edge of the pad trace characterizing the studied tracks likely indicates a subunguligrade foot posture (i.e., standing on the last and penultimate phalanges) in static stance, but plantiportal (i.e., the whole foot skeleton and related soft tissues are weight-bearing) during the dynamics of locomotion. The reconstructed posture might have implied an arched configuration of the articulated metapodials and at least of the proximal phalanges, as well as little movement capabilities of the metapodials. Usually, a subunguligrade-plantiportal autopod has been described for gigantic animals (over six hundreds kilograms of body weight) to obtain an efficient management of body weight. Nevertheless, this kind of autopod is described here for large but not gigantic animals, as the putative trackmakers of Pentasauropus were. This attribution implies that such an autopodial structure was promoted independently from the body size in the putative trackmakers. From an evolutionary point of view, subunguligrade-plantiportal autopods not necessarily must be related with an increase in body size, but rather the increase in body size requires a subunguligrade or unguligrade, plantiportal foot. Chronostratigraphically, Pentasauropus was reported from Upper Triassic deposits of South Africa and United States, and from late Middle Triassic and Upper Triassic deposits of Argentina. Based on the stratigraphic distribution of the ichnogenus currently accepted, a Late Triassic age is here proposed for the Pentasauropus-bearing levels of the Los Menucos Group.

Highlights

  • Tetrapod tracks are valuable fossils which inform us about the anatomy (e.g., Carpenter, 1992), functional adaptations (e.g., Baird, 1980), motion (e.g., Avanzini, Piñuela & GarcíaRamos, 2011) and ethology (e.g., Lockley et al, 2016) of extinct animals, greatly expanding the potential of information that is often precluded from the body-fossil record

  • Compared to the ichnogenus Pentasauropus, tracks from Los Menucos Group have allowed us to verify previous ichnological interpretations based on the reference material from Lesotho and have enabled us to corroborate the identification of a putative trackmaker and its limb posture

  • The inferred limb posture of the Pentasauropus trackmaker finds a match with the osteological data provided by the therapsid record (e.g., King, 1981a; Fröbisch, 2006) and allows to corroborate interpretations derived from body-fossils

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tetrapod tracks are valuable fossils which inform us about the anatomy (e.g., Carpenter, 1992), functional adaptations (e.g., Baird, 1980), motion (e.g., Avanzini, Piñuela & GarcíaRamos, 2011) and ethology (e.g., Lockley et al, 2016) of extinct animals, greatly expanding the potential of information that is often precluded from the body-fossil record. Among the Triassic vertebrate ichnological record, the Los Menucos ichnofauna, which is dominated by small therapsid footprints, was repeatedly studied (Casamiquela, 1964; Casamiquela, 1975; Casamiquela, 1987; Leonardi & De Oliveira, 1990; Leonardi, 1994; Domnanovich & Marsicano, 2006; Melchor & de Valais, 2006; de Valais, 2008; Domnanovich et al, 2008; Díaz-Martínez & de Valais, 2014). Several slabs with pentadactyl tracks comparable to those described by Domnanovich et al (2008) were collected many years ago but remained unpublished until now

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.