Abstract
EEG sleep spindle activity (SpA) during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep has been reported to be associated with measures of intelligence and overnight performance improvements. The reticular nucleus of the thalamus is generating sleep spindles in interaction with thalamocortical connections. The same system enables efficient encoding and processing during wakefulness. Thus, we examined if the triangular relationship between SpA, measures of intelligence and declarative learning reflect the efficiency of the thalamocortical system. As expected, SpA was associated with general cognitive ability, e.g. information processing speed. SpA was also associated with learning efficiency, however, not with overnight performance improvement in a declarative memory task. SpA might therefore reflect the efficiency of the thalamocortical network and can be seen as a marker for learning during encoding in wakefulness, i.e. learning efficiency.
Highlights
A beneficial effect of sleep for declarative memory has been discussed for a long time, but the extent of its impact or the underlying mechanism is still a matter of debate [1]
Learning of a declarative memory task resulted in an increase of sleep spindle density during subsequent sleep [3] and the sleep dependent performance improvement correlated with the number of sleep spindles [4]
Male participants participated in the study since the sleep spindle measures are known to be influenced by the menstrual cycle [19]
Summary
A beneficial effect of sleep for declarative memory has been discussed for a long time, but the extent of its impact or the underlying mechanism is still a matter of debate [1]. Learning of a declarative memory task resulted in an increase of sleep spindle density during subsequent sleep [3] and the sleep dependent performance improvement correlated with the number of sleep spindles [4]. There are studies reporting no sleep dependent performance improvement in declarative memory tasks [e.g. 5,6,7]. The divergence regarding sleep dependent performance improvement could be due to differences in the task design [1]. One major difference in the task design is the feedback for accuracy given in an immediate recall before sleep [8,9]. Such a feedback might be associated with performance improvements in delayed recall after sleep [7]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have