Trials of endovascular thrombectomy of basilar-artery occlusion compared to real-life data

Abstract

BackgroundTwo recent clinical trials showed mechanical thrombectomy (MT) of basilar-artery occlusions (BAO) in stroke to be safe and effective: Endovascular Treatment for Acute BAO (ATTENTION) and BAO Chinese Endovascular (BAOCHE). The trials restricted patient inclusion on both age and pre-stroke mRS, and with both trials conducted in China, population differences may affect generalisability of the trial results. MethodsConsecutive patients with BAO undergoing MT were registered from 2017 to 2021 with retrospective data collection at a single centre with a predominantly Caucasian catchment population of 2.7 million. Age and pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were not absolute contraindications for MT. We present functional outcome as mRS at 90 days, patient characteristics and procedural safety compared to the trial intervention groups. ResultsOf the 108 included patients, 50 % achieved mRS 0–3 at 90 days and mortality was 32 %, which was no different from ATTENTION (46 %, p = 0.40, 37 %, p = 0.31, respectively) and BAOCHE (46 %, p = 0.50, 31 %, p = 0.93). Pre-stroke mRS 0 was seen in 62 %, 89 %, and 77 % of the study patients, ATTENTION, and BAOCHE, respectively. Proximal segment BAO was less common (22 % vs. 31 %, p = 0.04, and 65 %, p < 0.01) and intracranial stenting less frequently used (9 % vs. 40 % and 55 %, p < 0.01) in study patients compared to ATTENTION and BAOCHE, respectively. ConclusionOutcome of MT in BAO stroke in a clinical patient cohort was similar to recent trials, despite broader patient inclusion and differences in both occluded BAO segment and use of stenting. Our study suggest that MT is safe and effective in a Caucasian population.