Abstract
We analyze when and why trials can emerge in equilibrium when a defendant may sequentially face multiple plaintiffs. Subsequent potential plaintiffs learn about their chances of winning from the initial trial outcome. A trial in the initial case is like an experiment that the defendant can run that would induce plaintiffs’ learning. We show that the initial case can go to trial in equilibrium when a favorable trial outcome for the defense can deter potential future plaintiffs from filing lawsuits. The possibility of non-meritorious lawsuits further raises the attraction of trials. We also show that when the initial plaintiff’s attorney may represent future clients, trials are more likely both because the attorney gains from learning, and because his ability to attract future clients may depend on how much his initial client receives.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
