TRH Stimulation Testing in Older Individuals with Persistent Subclinical Hypothyroidism: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Study of Levothyroxine and Liothyronine Administration

Abstract

Abstract Background: Subclinical hypothyroidism is common in older individuals. To better understand the underlying physiology, we examined the pituitary-thyroid axis using thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) stimulation testing both at baseline and after levothyroxine (LT4) and liothyronine (LT3) supplementation. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in men and women aged 70 years and over without anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies with persistent subclinical hypothyroidism, defined as having a TSH level between 4.5 and 19.9 µIU/mL with a normal free thyroxine (FT4) level at two consecutive time points. The primary outcome measures were TSH serum concentration area under the curve (AUC), maximum TSH serum concentration (Cmax), and change in free thyroxine (∆FT4) and total triiodothyronine (∆TT3) levels following TRH stimulation, each measured at three time points: once at baseline and once each after achieving euthyroid TSH levels with the two thyroid preparations. The maximal change in TSH (∆TSH); FT4 and TT3 AUCs; and time to maximal TSH, FT4, and TT3 (Tmax) were also analyzed. Results: Thirteen participants [mean (SD) age 77 (5) years], 4 women and 9 men, completed TRH stimulation testing at baseline and after achieving a TSH level of 0.5-1.5 µIU/mL with each therapy. Baseline mean TSH was 4.84 (1.29) µIU/mL. The mean LT4 dose was 105 (36) µg/day and LT4 dose was 34 (9) µg/day. After TRH stimulation, the mean TSH AUC (0-180) at baseline was 3099.5 (1424.4) µIU*min/mL, and significantly decreased after both LT4 [631.4 (315.2), p<0.001] and LT3 [631.5 (317.3), p<0.001]. There was no difference in TSH AUC (0-180) between LT4 and LT3 treatment arms. Baseline mean TSH Cmax was 27.2 (14.5) µIU/mL and significantly decreased after LT4 [5.5 (3.0), p<0.001] and LT3 [5.4 (2.9), p<0.001], with no difference between the LT4 and LT3 treatment arms. The ∆FT4 was 0.11 (0.07) ng/dL at baseline and decreased significantly on LT3. The ∆TT3 was 0.32 (0.09) ng/mL at baseline and significantly decreased on both LT4 and LT3, with no difference between treatment arms. Conclusions: Older individuals with antibody-negative persistent subclinical hypothyroidism have a heterogeneous TSH response to TRH stimulation. Our data show a significantly diminished response to TRH stimulation after thyroid hormone replacement, and they support the pharmacodynamic equivalence of LT4 and LT3 treatment.