Abstract
The construction industry is a fertile source of dispute. Payment disputes in the Malaysian construction industry are ancient issues that have been causing problems among construction players for decades. The settlement of disputes can be done by using the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in lieu of other alternatives or as a complement to Litigation. This paper is focused on Adjudication as a preferred dispute resolution method for the Malaysian construction industry. The enforcement of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act (CIPAA 2012) in 2014 is intended to provide swift dispute resolution and relief to unpaid construction industry claimants for work done, and facilitate cash flow in the construction industry as a whole. The purpose of this research is to establish the trends of adjudication cases that were intervened by the court within the period of April 2014 until February 2018, which is since the implementation of CIPAA 2012 in Malaysia. In order to determine a vast majority of matters that have been referred for adjudication under CIPAA 2012 and parties in dispute constitute the highest number of referrals, sixty-two court cases were identified. This research also reviewed previous case laws to identify the factors contributing to court referrals. Based on the review, most of adjudication cases in the Malaysian construction industry involve the Main contractor and Employer as dispute parties with the intention of challenging adjudication decisions as there has been excess of jurisdiction pursuant to Section 15 (d) applied by appellants together with the application enforcement of adjudication decision under Section 28 by respondents. The findings will be used as a platform to establish the dispute scenario of the Malaysian construction industry under the CIPAA 2012.
Highlights
The construction industry is facilitated by various disputes resolution methods due to its inherent nature which is very complex, involves relatively long project durations, is subject to many uncertainties, and is one of a kind
This research will investigate the factors that contribute to court referrals in order to establish the pattern of adjudication cases referred to the court in the Malaysian construction industry under the CIPAA 2012
The research proves the effectiveness of CIPAA in assisting payment disputes occurring in the Malaysian construction industry
Summary
The construction industry is facilitated by various disputes resolution methods due to its inherent nature which is very complex, involves relatively long project durations, is subject to many uncertainties, and is one of a kind. The primary objective of the Act is to address cash flow problems in the construction industry It mitigates the pervasive and prevalent practice of conditional payment which is ‘pay when paid, pay if paid' and decreases payment defaults by establishing a cheaper and speedier system of dispute resolution in the form of adjudication. Previous research has identified six impacts of the CIPAA 2012’s enforcement towards payment problems in the Malaysian construction cases from the Federal Court, the Court of Appeal and High Courts It is in line with the objectives of the paper which are to identify the vast majority of matters that have been referred for adjudication under CIPAA 2012, industry, which are i. Parties in disputes must have a contractual relationship in order to refer their disputes in court
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
