Abstract

1576 Background: Oncology drug development is an increasingly global endeavor, however it is unclear how enrollment in registrational clinical trials for lung cancer have been impacted. Clinical trial data must be reflective of the intended population in order to be considered applicable to U.S patients and medical practice, and for FDA review. Methods: Registrational clinical trials supporting lung cancer indications submitted to FDA from 2014 to 2022 were included. Patient enrollment per country was extracted for each trial, and countries were grouped into 9 global regions. The proportion of patients enrolled in the U.S and global regions were calculated for each trial. For the purpose of this analysis, MRCTs were defined as trials that enrolled at least 5% of patients from each of ≥ 3 global regions with no region accounting for ≥ 70% of patient enrollment. Trial-level patient enrollment was aggregated into 3 triennia: 2014-2016, 2017-2019, and 2020-2022. Results: A total of 66 pivotal trials supporting 59 applications submitted to FDA were evaluated during the study period. Of these, 91% ( n=60) were for non-small cell lung cancer while 9% ( n=6) were for small cell lung cancer; 59% ( n=39) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) while 41% ( n=27) were single-arm trials; 53% ( n=35) were for biologics while 47% ( n=31) were for non-biologics; and 86% ( n=30) of the biologics-based regimens were anti-programmed death (ligand)-1 antibody-containing regimens. The proportion of trials with no U.S patient enrollment increased from 4.8% in 2014-2016 to 19.0% in 2020-2022 while those with ≥ 10% U.S patient enrollment declined from 71.4% in 2014-2016 to 52.3% in 2020-2022. There was a decline in the proportion of trials conducted as MRCTs since 2014 from 85.7% in 2014-2016 to 66.7% in 2020-2022. Conclusions: This exploratory analysis suggests that there may be declining U.S patient enrollment in lung cancer pivotal trials, and the proportion of these trials conducted as MRCTs may also be declining. These patterns of decline appear to be driven by the countries selected for patient enrollment in RCTs rather than in single-arm trials. Pivotal trials that do not enroll U.S patients and are not conducted as true MRCTs may have limited applicability to U.S patients.[Table: see text]

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.