Abstract

Describing the changes in trauma volume and injury patterns during the course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic could help to inform policy development and hospital resource planning. To examine trends in trauma admissions throughout Los Angeles County (LAC) during the pandemic. In this cohort study, all trauma admissions to the 15 verified level 1 and level 2 trauma centers in LAC from January 1 to June 7, 2020 were reviewed. All trauma admissions from the same period in 2019 were used as historical control. For overall admissions, the study period was divided into 3 intervals based on daily admission trend analysis (January 1 through February 28, March 1 through April 9, April 10 through June 7). For the blunt trauma subgroup analysis, the study period was divided into 3 similar intervals (January 1 through February 27, February 28 through April 5, April 6 through June 7). COVID-19 pandemic. Trends in trauma admission volume and injury patterns. A total of 6777 patients in 2020 and 6937 in 2019 met inclusion criteria. Of those admitted in 2020, the median (interquartile range) age was 42 (28-61) years and 5100 (75.3%) were men. Mechanisms of injury were significantly different between the 2 years, with a higher incidence of penetrating trauma and fewer blunt injuries in 2020 compared with 2019 (penetrating: 1065 [15.7%] vs 1065 [15.4%]; blunt: 5309 [78.3%] vs 5528 [79.7%]). Overall admissions by interval in 2020 were 2681, 1684, and 2412, whereas in 2019 they were 2462, 1862, and 2613, respectively. There was a significant increase in overall admissions per week during the first interval (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.002-1.04; P = .03) followed by a decrease in the second interval (IRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.94; P < .001) and, finally, an increase in the third interval (IRR, 1.05; CI, 1.03-1.07; P < .001). On subgroup analysis, blunt admissions followed a similar pattern to overall admissions, while penetrating admissions increased throughout the study period. In this study, trauma centers throughout LAC experienced a significant change in injury patterns and admission trends during the COVID-19 pandemic. A transient decrease in volume was followed by a quick return to baseline levels. Trauma centers should prioritize maintaining access, capacity, and functionality during pandemics and other national emergencies.

Highlights

  • On January 20, 2020, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported the first confirmed case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Washington state, and on January 26, 2020, public health officials confirmed the first case in Los Angeles County (LAC).[1,2] In an effort to curb viral spread, local and state authorities across many areas of the country enforced social distancing guidelines with the closure of all nonessential businesses

  • There was a significant increase in overall admissions per week during the first interval followed by a decrease in the second interval (IRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.94; P < .001) and, an increase in the third interval (IRR, 1.05; CI, 1.03-1.07; P < .001)

  • Blunt admissions followed a similar pattern to overall admissions, while penetrating admissions increased throughout the study period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

On January 20, 2020, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported the first confirmed case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Washington state, and on January 26, 2020, public health officials confirmed the first case in Los Angeles County (LAC).[1,2] In an effort to curb viral spread, local and state authorities across many areas of the country enforced social distancing guidelines with the closure of all nonessential businesses. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) aptly put forth a guide on maintaining trauma center access and care during the pandemic.[6] Its recommendations were directed toward resource allocation, preserving capacity, and ensuring adequate protection of trauma team members. This was released 1 day after California’s stay-at-home order was put into effect, at a time of great uncertainty in terms of how strict limitations would alter trauma volume or injury patterns

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call