Abstract
348 Background: The evolution and adoption of better endoscopes and imaging allow for improved diagnostic capacity for upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). We evaluated the changes in diagnostic modalities used to establish a diagnosis of UTUC. Additionally, we assessed how these changes affected the stage of patients receiving definitive surgery. Methods: Using linked SEER-Medicare data from 1992-2009, we identified patients between the age of 66-90 who underwent surgical treatment for UTUC. Among this cohort we assessed the types of diagnostics: endoscopy, computed tomography urogram (CTU), magnetic resonance urography (MRU), intravenous pyelogram (IVP), and retrograde pyelogram (RGP), used to evaluate their disease. Additionally, we dichotomized the final stage at surgery as lower stage disease (Ta, CIS, or unknown stage) or higher-stage disease (T1 or greater). Tests for trend were calculated for the five diagnostic modalities. Logistic regression models were fit to determine the impact of diagnostic modalities on stage at surgery. Results: We found a downward trend in utilization of IVP and RPG over time (p < 0.001, p = 0.011) with IVP having largest decline in use. Endoscopy, CTU and MRU all demonstrated increased utilization over time (p <0.0001). The incidence of lower stage disease was not found to be changing over time (p = 0.123). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that among modern use (2000-2009), only the use of endoscopy and IVP were associated with smaller tumors (CI 1.310-1.996, CI 1.150-1.720). Conclusions: Modern diagnostics (endoscopy, CTU, MRU) have supplanted traditional methods of establishing a diagnosis of UTUC. Although these newer adopted technologies have a greater sensitivity in diagnosis of UTUC, only the use of endoscopy prior to definitive management has been associated with the diagnosis of smaller tumors.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.