Trends in the development of computed tomography in the Russian Federation in 2011–2021

Abstract

The article presents the analysis of the structure of computed tomography diagnostics according to the forms of the federal state statistical observation (radiation-hygienic passports in 2011–2021, forms № 3-DOZ in 2011-2021 and forms № 30 in 2014–2020) in order to assess the status of CT diagnostics in the Russian Federation and identify the main trends in the development of this type of radiation diagnostics and patient doses. In 2011–2021, there was a sharp development of CT diagnostics in the Russian Federation – an increase in the number of CT examinations per 1000 people (up to a factor of 5.9 – from 32 CT examinations per 1000 people to 189 CT examinations per 1000 people) and the contribution of CT in the collective dose from medical diagnostic exposure (3 times from 26% to 77%). The number of CT examinations per 1 CT device from 2014 to 2019 increased by 2 thousand (52%), and in 2020 by another 1.85 thousand (32% compared to 2019) and reached 7.7 thousand. The increase in the number of CT examinations was mainly due to the increased use of CT equipment. The main contribution to the structure and collective dose of computed tomography in 2021 is made by examinations of chest (58%/65%), abdomen (8%/14%), pelvis and hips (3%/4%), skull and maxillofacial area (18%/7%). In 2011-2021 for chest CT examinations, the average effective dose was in the range from 4.2 to 5.9 mSv per examination, for abdomen – from 6.5 to 9.2 mSv, for pelvis and hips – 5 to 6.7 mSv, for skull and maxillofacial area – 1.5 to 2.4 mSv. The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021 caused a change in the structure of CT examinations and collective dose in the Russian Federation – the chest CT examinations occupied the first place of the contribution to the number of examinations and the collective dose. The number of CT examinations per 1000 people and the contribution of CT to the collective dose from medical diagnostic exposure in the Russian Federation were significantly lower than those in foreign countries (up to a factor of 3.5 in the number of CT examinations per 1000 people and up to a factor of 1.6 of the contribution of CT to the collective dose).