Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the trends in mortality, as well as in the timing and cause of death, among extremely preterm infants at the limit of viability, and thus to identify the clinical factors that contribute to decreased mortality.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 382 infants born at 23–26 weeks’ gestation; 124 of the infants were born between 2001 and 2005 (period I) and 258 were born between 2006 and 2011 (period II). We stratified the infants into two subgroups–“23–24 weeks” and “25–26 weeks”–and retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and mortality in each group, as well as the timing and cause of death. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were done to identify the clinical factors associated with mortality.ResultsThe overall mortality rate in period II was 16.7% (43/258), which was significantly lower than that in period I (30.6%; 38/124). For overall cause of death, there were significantly fewer deaths due to sepsis (2.4% [6/258] vs. 8.1% [10/124], respectively) and air-leak syndrome (0.8% [2/258] vs. 4.8% (6/124), respectively) during period II than during period I. Among the clinical factors of time period, 1-and 5-min Apgar score, antenatal steroid identified significant by univariate analyses. 5-min Apgar score and antenatal steroid use were significantly associated with mortality in multivariate analyses.ConclusionImproved mortality rate attributable to fewer deaths due to sepsis and air leak syndrome in the infants with 23–26 weeks’ gestation was associated with higher 5-minute Apgar score and more antenatal steroid use.

Highlights

  • Recent improvements in perinatal and neonatal intensive care have resulted in improved survival in extremely preterm (EPT) infants near the limit of viability [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]

  • Among the clinical factors of time period, 1-and 5-min Apgar score, antenatal steroid identified significant by univariate analyses. 5-min Apgar score and antenatal steroid use were significantly associated with mortality in multivariate analyses

  • As the decision for providng active treatment for these EPT infants is usually indivisualized based on the shared-decision making by parents, statistics derived from populations including large numbers of EPT infants without active treatments might mispresent the infants’ chances of survival, and misguide the parents to forgo initiating active lifesaving intervention

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent improvements in perinatal and neonatal intensive care have resulted in improved survival in extremely preterm (EPT) infants near the limit of viability [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The findings of this study that all EPT infants admitted to our hospital received active treatment support the importance of providing accurate survival data for parental counseling. Survival in infants near the limit of viability has been improved by active treatment policies, without a concomitant increase in morbidity among survivors [4, 11,12,13,14,15]. Taken together, these findings suggest that active treatments of EPT infants are more beneficial than harmful

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call