Trends in Outcomes of Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Disease or Three-Vessel Disease With the Routine Incorporation of Fractional Flow Reserve in Real Practice

Abstract

Impact of fractional flow reserve guidance on revascularization strategies and outcomes for severe coronary artery disease was unclear. We evaluate changes in treatment strategy and clinical outcomes and to compare the effectiveness between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation drug-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in severe coronary artery disease patients before and after routine use of FFR. From January 2008 to December 2011, we enrolled 2,612 patients with significant left main coronary artery disease or 3-vessel disease. We obtained data of patients before (from January 2008 to December 2009) and after (January 2010 to December 2011) the routine use of FFR. We used propensity score matching to compare the rate of primary outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization [Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral event; MACCE]) at 1year. Introduction of routine FFR use reduced the proportion of patients receiving CABG from 54% to 43% (p <0.001). The risk of MACCE before routine FFR use was significantly higher in the PCI group than the CABG group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 3.03, p= 0.021), whereas that after routine FFR use was not significantly different between the groups (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.59 to 2.52, p= 0.59). The risk of MACCE in patients receiving revascularization lowered after routine FFR use compared with that before (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.85, p= 0.005). In conclusion, routine incorporation of FFR resulted in improved PCI outcomes, comparable with concurrent CABG in patients with severe coronary artery disease who received revascularization.