Trends in Osteopathic Authorship in Orthopedic Publications and Its Impact on Adult Reconstruction Match Rates

Abstract

BackgroundDoctors of osteopathy (D.O.) have historically been underrepresented in the orthopedic literature. As adult reconstruction (AR) continues to rank among the most competitive orthopedic fellowships, participation in research likely serves a key role for successfully matching. This study sought to identify trends in D.O. orthopedic publications and assess for correlations between these trends and osteopathic AR match results. MethodsThe top 10 orthopedic surgery journals based on impact factor were selected for analysis. Articles published between 2010 and 2021 were screened to assess for publications with a D.O. author, as well as authorship position. A total of 29,499 articles were available for final analysis. Data from the San Francisco Residency and Fellowship Match Services were also reviewed to evaluate the number of osteopathic applicants and their match rates during the same study period. Trends in D.O. publications and osteopathic AR match rates were then assessed for any correlations. ResultsFrom 2010 to 2021, there was a significant increase in orthopedic and arthroplasty-related publications with a D.O. author (P < .0001), as well as D.O. first (P = .0006) and senior authorship positions (P = .009). Osteopathic match rate significantly increased during the study period (P = .003). There was a strong correlation between the increase in osteopathic match rate and arthroplasty-related publications with a D.O. author (r = 0.76). ConclusionsFrom 2010 to 2021, there was an upward trend of osteopathic orthopedic publications. This increase is strongly correlated with an increase in osteopathic AR match rate. Our findings suggest that authorship in publications may play a key role in successfully matching into an AR fellowship.