Abstract
BackgroundLarge clinical trials are lack of data on non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for acute stroke patients.AimTo evaluate the choice of oral anticoagulants at acute hospital discharge in stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and clarify the underlying characteristics potentially affecting that choice using the multicenter Stroke Acute Management with Urgent Risk‐factor Assessment and Improvement‐NVAF registry (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01581502).MethodThe study included 1192 acute ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (527 women, 77·7 ± 9·9 years old) between September 2011 and March 2014, during which three nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant oral anticoagulants were approved for clinical use. Oral anticoagulant choice at hospital discharge (median 23‐day stay) was assessed.ResultsWarfarin was chosen for 650 patients, dabigatran for 203, rivaroxaban for 238, and apixaban for 25. Over the three 10‐month observation periods, patients taking warfarin gradually decreased to 46·5% and those taking nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants increased to 48·0%. As compared with warfarin users, patients taking nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants included more men, were younger, more frequently had small infarcts, and had lower scores for poststroke CHADS 2, CHA 2 DS 2‐VASc, and HAS‐BLED, admission National Institutes of Health stroke scale, and discharge modified Rankin Scale. Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were started at a median of four‐days after stroke onset without early intracranial hemorrhage. Patients starting nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants earlier had smaller infarcts and lower scores for the admission National Institutes of Health stroke scale and the discharge modified Rankin Scale than those starting later. Choice of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants was independently associated with 20‐day or shorter hospitalization (OR 2·46, 95% CI 1·87–3·24).ConclusionsWarfarin use at acute hospital discharge was still common in the initial years after approval of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, although nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant users increased gradually. The index stroke was milder and ischemia‐risk indices were lower in nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant users than in warfarin users. Early initiation of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants seemed safe.
Highlights
Between 2009 and 2013, four novel oral anticoagulants, or in other words nonvitamin K antagonist (VKA) oral anticoagulants (NOACs) [1], were shown to be at least as effective for reducing stroke and as safe as warfarin, in particular more protective against intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) than warfarin, for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) [2,3,4,5]
In this prospective observational study, several major findings related to the trends of OAC choice for NVAF patients with acute ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) over 31 months during which three NOACs were approved for clinical use in Japan were identified
NOACs were prevalent for independent patients, corresponding to discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores 0–2, and warfarin was overwhelmingly more common for patients with mRS score 5
Summary
Between 2009 and 2013, four novel oral anticoagulants, or in other words nonvitamin K antagonist (VKA) oral anticoagulants (NOACs) [1], were shown to be at least as effective for reducing stroke and as safe as warfarin, in particular more protective against intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) than warfarin, for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) [2,3,4,5]. These NOACs have a wider therapeutic range and fewer drug and food interactions than VKAs, and were proven to be useful for secondary stroke prevention in patients with NVAF [6,7,8]. The optimal timing for beginning NOACs for acute stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients has not been clear
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.