Abstract

Abstract Introduction In Denmark, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) has served as the national reperfusion strategy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) since 2003. Since then, extensive changes in management and treatment of patients with STEMI have been introduced. We investigated the temporal trends in one-year mortality and ischemic outcomes after STEMI. Methods We included all first-time STEMI patients treated with pPCI in Western Denmark from 2003 to 2017. Patients were categorized into four time periods based on year of pPCI treatment (2003–2006, 2007–2010, 2011–2014, 2015–2017) and followed for one year. Outcomes included all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI: follow-up started after 30 days post-pPCI since the validity of recurrent MI is low in the first 30 days), and ischemic stroke. We also identified a sex and age matched comparison cohort without prior cardiovascular disease from the Western Denmark general population. Groups were compared using sex- and age-adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) by Cox regression with the first period as reference. Results A total of 18,538 STEMI patients and 92,690 individuals from the general population were included. One-year mortality in STEMI patients decreased from 10.8% in 2003–2006 to 7.8% in 2015–2017 (aHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60–0.80), while it was steady in the general population cohort (figure). The one-year risk of recurrent MI and ischemic stroke also decreased from 2003–2006 to 2015–2017 (MI: 3.5% vs. 2.4%, aHR: 0.66, 95% CI 0.51–0.86; ischemic stroke: 2.5% vs. 1.9%, aHR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42–0.80). These improvements coincided with increased up-take of evidence-based treatments, especially drug-eluting stents (39% vs. 90%), high-intensity statins (3% vs. 87%), and newer antiplatelet agents. Conclusions From 2003 to 2017, the one-year risk of death, recurrent MI, and ischemic stroke decreased substantially among patients with STEMI. These improvements occurred simultaneously with the gradual implementation of evidence-based guideline-directed treatments. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Aase and Ejnar Danielsen foundation

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.