Abstract

ObjectivesHealth equity is crucial to population health. To achieve this aim, extensive monitoring efforts beyond traditional disparities research are required. This analysis assesses trends in health equity for children from 1997 to 2018.MethodsHealth equity in a given year is calculated using a previously developed measure as the mean weighted departure of individual health from the best achievable level of health. This criterion is defined as the median health of the most socially privileged identifiable group: white, non-Latinx boys in upper-income households.Using more than 20 years of data from the National Health Interview Survey, we apply this methodology to six measures of child health: parent-reported health status, school days missed due to illness or injury in the past year, a strength and difficulties questionnaire score, emotional difficulties, a toddler mental health indicator score, and toddler depression. We separately calculate racial/ethnic and income disparities.Monte Carlo simulation is used to assess whether trends are statistically significant.ResultsHealth equity among children increased gradually over the past 2 decades, with five of the six measures demonstrating upward trends. Improvements in health equity are stronger among younger children (age 0–3 and 4–7). Unlike previous work examining adults, both types of disparities narrowed over the study period.Conclusions for PracticeProgress on health equity requires accountability to an objective metric. This analysis suggests some improvement over the past two decades, although these gains are under threat from potential decreases in government spending on programs affecting children and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Highlights

  • Toddler mental health measures show the strongest trend [(toddler Mental Health Indicator (MHI): 6.33; 95% CI 4.81, 7.89);]

  • From 1997 to 2018, health equity for children in the United States has generally improved. This result holds across several measures of physical and mental health. It cannot be known whether more progress was possible over the previous 20 years, the United States appeared to be moving in the right direction prior to the COVID-19 pandemic

  • The results suggest that society’s greater relative willingness to protect and invest in younger children may be buffering them against the social and economic forces that have led to reduced health equity among adults, while results for any such investments in adolescents are lagging

Read more

Summary

Objectives

Health equity is crucial to population health To achieve this aim, extensive monitoring efforts beyond traditional disparities research are required. Extensive monitoring efforts beyond traditional disparities research are required This analysis assesses trends in health equity for children from 1997 to 2018. Methods Health equity in a given year is calculated using a previously developed measure as the mean weighted departure of individual health from the best achievable level of health This criterion is defined as the median health of the most socially privileged identifiable group: white, non-Latinx boys in upper-income households. Conclusions for Practice Progress on health equity requires accountability to an objective metric This analysis suggests some improvement over the past two decades, these gains are under threat from potential decreases in government spending on programs affecting children and the COVID-19 pandemic

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.