Abstract
AbstractThe United States is currently responsible for 40%–45% of the world’s corn supply and 70% of total global exports [the U.S. Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA–NASS)]. Therefore, analyses of the spatial and temporal patterns of historical U.S. corn yields might provide insight into future crop-production potential and food security. In this study, county-level maize yield data from 1910 to 2001 were used to characterize the spatial heterogeneity of yield growth rates and interannual yield variability across the U.S. Corn Belt.Widespread decadal-scale changes in corn yield variability and yield growth rates have occurred since the 1930s across the Corn Belt, but the response has varied substantially with geographic location. Northern portions of the Great Plains have experienced consistently high interannual corn yield variability, averaging 30%–40% relative to the mean. Increasing usage of irrigation in Nebraska, Kansas, and Texas, since the 1950s, has helped boost yields by 75%–90% over rain-fed corn, creating a yield gap of 2–4 T ha−1 between irrigated and nonirrigated corn that could potentially be exploited in other regions. Furthermore, irrigation has reduced interannual variability by a factor of 3 in these same regions. A small region from eastern Iowa into northern Illinois and southern Wisconsin has experienced minimal interannual yield variability, averaging only 6%–10% relative to mean yields.This paper shows that the choice of time period used for statistical analysis impacted conclusions drawn about twentieth-century trends in corn yield variability. Widespread increases in yield variability were apparent from 1950 onward, but were not significant over the entire 1930–2001 period. There is also evidence that yield variability decreased from the early 1990s to 2001. Corn yield growth rates peaked at an annual-average rate of 3%–5% in the 1960s (124.5 kg ha−1 yr−1), but have steadily declined to a relative rate of 0.78% yr−1 (49.2 kg ha−1 yr−1) during the 1990s. A general inverse relationship between increasing corn yield and decreasing yield growth rates was noted after county-level yields reached 4 T ha−1, suggesting that widespread, significant increases in corn yield are not likely to take place in the future, particularly on irrigated land, without a second agricultural revolution.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.