Abstract

Magnitude–frequency (M–F) relationships represent important information on slope deformation and are used in hazard assessment or as supporting data for urban planning. Various approaches have been used to extract such relationships in the past, but most of these methods drove at the problem of exact events´ frequency determination. Dendrogeomorphic (tree ring-based) approaches are actually thought to be the most precise method of dating past mass movement events that occurred within the last several centuries. Together with information on the spatial positions of the analysed trees, they represent a potentially very valuable tool for reconstructing M–F relationships, although their use for this purpose has been very rare in the past. In this study, M–F relationships are reconstructed using dendrogeomorphic methods for three landslides of different types (a translational slide, a flow-like slide, and a rotational slide) occurring in different geological materials (thick-bedded flysch, limestone marls, and volcanic breccia). In total, 572 disturbed trees were analysed, and chronologies of mass movement events were built. Landslide magnitudes were expressed in three ways: (i) the value of the standard It index; (ii) the area, as determined using homogenous morphological units; and (iii) the area, as determined using tree buffers. The power-law nature of M–F relationships was confirmed for all the landslides that were studied and using all the approaches that were applied. All of the combinations of results yielded high correlation values; nevertheless, differences were noted. The advantages and limitations of each approach used to reconstruct M–F relationships are also discussed.

Highlights

  • Many questions connected with landslide hazard assessment have been solved

  • Landslide magnitudes were expressed in three ways: (i) the value of the standard It index; (ii) the area, as determined using homogenous morphological units; and (iii) the area, as determined using tree buffers

  • 572 disturbed trees (2288 tree ring series) were analysed from three different types of landslides that occur under different geological conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many questions connected with landslide hazard assessment have been solved (the movement mechanism, relative stability, triggers, etc.). An understanding of the M–F relationships of landslides provides an important basis for recommendations in hazard assessment, urban planning or protective measures [1]. The magnitude of mass movement events can be expressed as the area of the reactivated part of a landslide [13,14,15,16], or the volume of the moving mass [17]. Field inventories of signs of landslides, approaches based on remote sensing techniques, and modelling of landslide volumes are methods that are often applied for this purpose. The application of absolute dating methods seems to be the most exact approach for the determination of landslide frequency [18]. This aspect of M–F relationships is at least as difficult to determine

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call