Abstract

Trees along linear features are important landscape features, and their loss threatens ecological connectivity. Until recently, trees outside of woodlands (TOWs) were largely unmapped however; the development of innovation mapping techniques provides opportunities to understand the distribution of such trees and to apply spatially explicit models to explore the importance of trees for connectivity. In this study, we demonstrate the utility of models when investigating tree loss and impacts on connectivity. Specifically, we investigated the consequences of tree loss due to the removal of roadside trees, a common management response for diseased or damaged trees, on wider landscape functional connectivity. We simulated the loss of roadside trees within six focal areas of the south east of the UK. We used a spatially explicit individual-based modelling platform, RangeShifter, to model the movement of 81 hypothetical actively dispersing woodland breeding species across these agriculturally fragmented landscapes. We investigated the extent to which removal of trees, from roadsides within the wider landscape, affected the total number of successful dispersers in any given year and the number of breeding woodlands that became isolated through time. On average roadside trees accounted for <2% of land cover, but removing 60% of them (~1.2% of land cover) nevertheless decreased the number of successful dispersers by up to 17%. The impact was greatest when roadside trees represented a greater proportion of canopy cover. The study therefore demonstrates that models such as RangeShifter can provide valuable tools for assessing the consequences of losing trees outside of woodlands.

Highlights

  • The loss and fragmentation of habitats is a major threat to biodiversity (Haddad et al, 2015)

  • The proportion of variance in successful dispersers explained by landscape replicate was between 3% and 30%, indicating that the actual spatial pattern of tree removal is likely to be important for connectivity

  • As more trees were removed the variance explained by carrying capacity (K) and directional persistence (DP) increased and the proportion of variance explained ranged from 5% to 50% and < 1% to 18% respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The loss and fragmentation of habitats is a major threat to biodiversity (Haddad et al, 2015). Scattered trees within a fragmented landscape have a significant role to play in combating the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation. Hedgerows and scattered trees alongside roads and railway lines are often cited as examples of habitat corridors (Bailey, 2007; Bennett, 1990; McCollin et al, 2000; Roy and de Blois, 2008). In a recent study, Fischer et al (2010) found that scattered trees in an agricultural landscape had a disproportionately positive effect on species richness, emphasising their role as keystone structures in fragmented landscapes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call