Abstract

The United States national inventory program measures a subset of tree heights in each plot in the Pacific Northwest. Unmeasured tree heights are predicted by adding the difference between modeled tree heights at two measurements to the height observed at the first measurement. This study compared different approaches for directly modeling 10-year height increment of red alder (RA) and ponderosa pine (PP) in Washington and Oregon using national inventory data from 2001–2015. In addition to the current approach, five models were implemented: nonlinear exponential, log-transformed linear, gamma, quasi-Poisson, and zero-inflated Poisson models using both tree-level (e.g., height, diameter at breast height, and compacted crown ratio) and plot-level (e.g., basal area, elevation, and slope) measurements as predictor variables. To account for negative height increment observations in the modeling process, a constant was added to shift all response values to greater than zero (log-transformed linear and gamma models), the negative increment was set to zero (quasi-Poisson and zero-inflated Poisson models), or a nonlinear model, which allows negative observations, was used. Random plot effects were included to account for the hierarchical data structure of the inventory data. Predictive model performance was examined through cross-validation. Among the implemented models, the gamma model performed best for both species, showing the smallest root mean square error (RSME) of 2.61 and 1.33 m for RA and PP, respectively (current method: RA—3.33 m, PP—1.40 m). Among the models that did not add the constant to the response, the quasi-Poisson model exhibited the smallest RMSE of 2.74 and 1.38 m for RA and PP, respectively. Our study showed that the prediction of tree height increment in Oregon and Washington can be improved by accounting for the negative and zero height increment values that are present in inventory data, and by including random plot effects in the models.

Highlights

  • Forest growth models are used to quantitatively generalize forest stand development [1]

  • The models that we considered as alternatives to this baseline approach needed to accommodate the negative height increment observations in the dataset

  • Among the eight tree-level and plot-level predictor variables, DBH at Time 1, height at Time 1, crown class, site productivity, and slope were found to be significant in predicting height increment of red alder (RA) in log-linear, gamma, and quasi-Poisson models (Table 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forest growth models are used to quantitatively generalize forest stand development [1]. A variety of different data sources have been used to develop growth models: permanent plots measured over a full rotation, interval plots measured over one or more growth periods, and temporary plots [2]. Growth model development is challenging to validate if the data used for modeling are not from a well-controlled growth and yield experiment [1], for which detailed information about site conditions and management history are available. These experimental data sets are not representative of the total population [3] across a large geographical area and gradients of environmental conditions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call