Tree cavities in riverine forests: What determines their occurrence and use by hole-nesting passerines?

Abstract

We assessed: (1) the relative importance of different macro- and microhabitat characteristics for explaining the occurrence of tree cavities and their occupancy by hole-nesting passerines and (2) the role of woodpeckers as keystone species in riverine aspen and birch stands in central Estonia. In 1999–2003, multiple surveys were carried out in 16 stands with a total area of 104 ha. Of the 713 tree-holes found, 483 were considered suitable for secondary cavity-nesters. The mean density was 4.1 ± 3.0 (S.D.) suitable cavities ha −1 (including 2.0 ± 1.3 suitable for hole-nesting passerines). Woodpeckers had excavated 88% of suitable cavities. The density of breeding woodpeckers explained 78% of variance in the density of woodpecker-excavated cavities (mean = 28 holes per pair) and 51% of natural cavities. Woodpecker-excavated and natural cavities occurred in very similar conditions, determined mostly by tree species, decay and size, stand type, as well as the vicinity of other cavities. Ninety-six of 161 occupancy cases of cavities were by passerines, which – probably to reduce the risk of nest predation or physical destruction – preferred small natural cavities in live trees. We conclude that riverine areas are important centres of cavity supply in forested regions and the value of woodpeckers as keystone species comes mostly from the large quantity, but not quality, of the cavities they provide. The results imply that: (1) for cavity-nesters, large (DBH > 30 cm) broadleaved trees, both live and dead, are the most important to retain during forestry operations in hemiboreal riverine forests and (2) woodpecker censuses may indicate cavity abundance, particularly if woodpecker-holes dominate among all cavities.