Abstract
Bailey CS, Urquhart JC, Dvorak MF, Nadeau M, Boyd MC, Thomas KC, Kwon BK, Gurr KR, Bailey SI, Fisher CG. Orthosis Versus No Orthosis for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures without Neurologic Injury: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Equivalence Trial. Spine J. 2014 Nov 1;14(11):2557-64. ### Question: In patients with a burst fracture of the thoracolumbar spine, is treatment with a thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) equivalent to treatment without a TLSO? ### Design: Randomized (allocation concealed), blinded (outcome assessors), controlled trial with 24 months of follow-up. ### Setting: 3 Canadian tertiary spine centers. ### Patients: 96 neurologically intact patients who were 16 to 60 years of age (mean age, 40 years; 70% men) and had sustained, within the past 3 days, an isolated AO-A3 burst fracture between T10 and L3 with a kyphotic deformity of <35°. Exclusion criteria included the inability to wear a brace, mobilization with or without a brace before recruitment, pathologic or open fracture, drug or alcohol dependence, and previous injury or surgery to the thoracolumbar region. Data were available for 92 patients (96%) for measurement of the primary outcome at 3 months; the rate of follow-up was 71% at 24 months. ### Intervention: Patients were allocated to treatment with (n = 47) or without (n = 49) a …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.