Treatment strategy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with artery involvement.

Abstract

373 Background: It has been still controversial to perform surgical resection with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with artery involvement (BR-A), because an aggressive surgery leads to high morbidity and mortality with low R0 rate for the BR-A patients. In this study, we evaluated whether or not neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection improves survival benefits for BR-A patients. Methods: There were 138 patients with BR-A among 330 pancreatic cancer patients underwent surgical resection at Wakayama Medical University Hospital. We compared clinicopathological factors between 38 BR-A patients with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection and 100 BR-A patients with upfront surgery to evaluate the clinical impacts of neoadjuvant therapy. Results: The overall survival (OS) of BR-A patients was significantly shorter than that of the patients with borderline resectbale pancreatic cancer with portal vein/ superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) involvement (n=76) and resectable pancreatic cancer (n=105) who underwent surgical resection (median OS: 13.6 vs. 20.6 months, P<0.001). The OS of BR-A patient with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection was significantly longer than those with upfront surgery (median OS: 20.2 vs. 12.9 months, P=0.047). Multivariate analysis showed that older age (P=0.027), pathological PV/SMV invasion (P=0.031), moderated or poor differentiated tumor (P=0.008), positive lymph node ratio ³a0.1 (P=0.018), and no postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (P<0.001) were independent poor prognostic factors for BR-A patients. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant treatment might bring the clinical benefits for BR-A patients, and it is important to develop the appropriate regimen of neoadjuvant therapy and postoperative adjuvant therapy for longer survival in BR-A patients. Clinical trial information: 000003795.