Treatment-Sensitive and Treatment-Dependent Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Yield Superior Failure-Free and Overall Survival Compared to Treatment-Resistant Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

Abstract

Response to treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) may help predict prognosis and outcomes. We hypothesized that the response of cGVHD to treatment and the ability to taper immunosuppression define distinct treatment response categories that differ in terms of risk factors and prognosis. Our aim was to determine specific clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with 3 distinct cGVHD treatment response groups based on the response to and duration of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) as treatment-sensitive (TS), treatment-resistant (TR), and treatment-dependent (TD) cGVHD. This retrospective single-institution cohort study included 1142 consecutive adult and pediatric recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) performed for malignant and nonmalignant disorders at the University of Minnesota between 2008 and 2016. All donor, graft, conditioning regimen, and GVHD prophylaxis strategies were included, but only patients who commenced systemic treatment within 30 days of cGVHD diagnosis were included. A total of 185 patients who developed cGVHD necessitating IST within 30 days of cGVHD diagnosis were included in this analysis. At 1 year after cGVHD onset, 13% of the patients were TS, 27% were TD, and 60% were TR (including 14% deceased), whereas at 2 years after cGVHD onset, 29% were TS, 5% were TD, and 66% were TR (including 22% deceased). In a landmark analysis starting at 1 year after cGVHD onset, 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were lowest in the TR group (FFS, 38%; OS, 70%), with comparable outcomes in the TD (74% and 82%, respectively) and TS (79% for both) groups. Compared to no cGVHD, TR cGVHD was associated with worse OS at 5 years after cGVHD (hazard ratio, 2.09 versus no cGVHD; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.3; P < .01). Our findings suggest that refining cGVHD classification into 3 treatment response states defines important predictors of early and late clinical outcomes and identifies patients needing more effective treatment.