Abstract

From 1977 to 1988, 215 patients with a diagnosis of testicular seminoma were referred to the University Hospital, Hamburg, West Germany, for radiation therapy (RT). In 15 patients a careful review of the histologic condition showed signs of embryonal cell carcinoma. Three patients refused completion of therapy. No patient was lost to follow-up. On this basis, a retrospective review of 197 patients was carried out. One hundred thirty-three patients were classified as Stage I (67%), 39 as Stage II (20%), 8 as Stage III (4%), and 17 as Stage IV (9%). One hundred eighty patients had classic seminoma and 17 had anaplastic seminoma. All patients underwent high inguinal orchiectomy before treatment. Seven patients with Stages III and IV received chemotherapy before RT. Patients with Stages I and II were treated with 40-Gy photons to paraaortic and parailiac fields. Ten patients with Stage III and IV seminoma received 30-Gy photons to mediastinal and supraclavicular fields as well. Sixty patients received additional inguinal RT. The overall 5-year survival rate (corrected for intercurrent death, except for treatment toxicity) was 100% for Stage I, 100% for Stage II, 87% for Stage III, and 87% for Stage IV. The mean follow-up time was 6.3 years (range, 0.6 to 11.9 years). An evaluation of all patients showed no difference according to histologic condition or prior chemotherapy. Mediastinal and supraclavicular irradiation showed no improvement in treatment results. Acute toxicity consisted of mild to moderate emesis, increased bowel frequency, erythema, and, in four cases leucopenia and thrombopenia (all World Health Organization [WHO] Grades I to II). However, one patient died of a pulmonary fibrosis 1 month after mediastinal irradiation and 2 months after polychemotherapy, and a gastroduodenal ulcer developed in another patient 1.5 months after paraaortic RT and prior polychemotherapy. Overall, the data suggest that to avoid overtreatment and consecutive treatment morbidity reduced doses of 30 Gy and a restrictive treatment planning adapted to the individual risk are sufficient for RT for testicular seminoma. An alternative to postoperative RT in Stage I (and possibly Stage II) seminoma could be no RT, but close follow-up instead.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.