Treatment responsive acute GVHD after posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis: incidence and clinical outcomes

Abstract

BackgroundPost-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has emerged as standard of care for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention in adult patients without increasing malignant relapse. We previously defined acute GVHD (aGVHD) treatment response categories as either corticosteroid-sensitive (SS), dependent (SD), or resistant (SR) based on response to first-line corticosteroids and reported their clinical outcomes following non-PTCy based prophylaxis. Over one-third of patients developed aGVHD requiring systemic therapy. Cases were predominantly SR with a 14% overall incidence of SR aGVHD. The incidence and clinical outcomes of these three distinct aGVHD treatment response groups following PTCy-based prophylaxis is not well described. ObjectiveThe objective of this retrospective, single-institution, cohort study was to assess the incidence and clinical outcomes of SS, SD, and SR aGVHD following HCT with PTCy-based prophylaxis using a prophylactic regimen of PTCy, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Study designWe included 196 consecutive (2017-2021) adult and pediatric patients receiving allogeneic HCT for malignant and non-malignant disorders at the University of Minnesota. Patients received PTCy on days +3 and +4 plus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil prophylaxis. Bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) graft sources and related and unrelated donors were included. Recipients received myeloablative (MAC) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. ResultsIn 196 allografts, 54 (28%) developed aGVHD before day +180 with median time to onset of 50 days (IQR 34-71 days). Of those, 32 patients (16% overall) developed maximum grade II-III aGVHD requiring systemic corticosteroids with the following response: 13 (41%) SS, 10 (31%) SD, and 9 (28%) SR. Overall incidence of SR aGVHD was 4.6%. Only 12 patients (6%) developed maximum grade III aGVHD while none had grade IV aGVHD. 2-year overall survival analyzed from 80 days after initiation of systemic treatment was similar in the SS and SD groups (77 and 75%, respectively), comparable to those without aGVHD (81%), but was lowest in the SR group (20%) with GVHD being the primary cause of death. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was highest in the SR group. MN high risk and higher GVHD grade at onset were risk factors for developing SR aGVHD. ConclusionsOverall, we report a low incidence (16%) of aGVHD requiring systemic corticosteroids with PTCy-based prophylaxis. Acute GVHD cases were predominantly SS aGVHD with a lower incidence of SD and SR aGVHD. Our findings suggest that PTCy-based prophylaxis reduces rates of treatment resistant aGVHD. Patients with SR aGVHD had the worst clinical outcomes and poorest survival. Those with SS and SD aGVHD had similar clinical outcomes, both better than SR aGVHD.