Abstract

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers are approved for use in several immune-related conditions, but treatment patterns, such as switching between TNF blockers or restarting treatment after a gap in therapy, are not clearly established. This analysis examined TNF blocker treatment patterns within the first year after initiating treatment with etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis. Administrative claims data from the MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (Thomson Reuters, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) were analyzed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis who were continuously enrolled and newly initiated etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab treatment between January 1, 2005 and July 1, 2009. Persistence (no treatment gap ≥45 days), restarting index therapy (after a ≥45-day treatment gap), switching to a different biologic of interest (certolizumab, golimumab, ustekinumab, alefacept, abatacept, rituximab, or tocilizumab), and stopping (≥45-day treatment gap with no restart or switch) were analyzed for the first year after the index date. A total of 8,454 patients had an index claim for etanercept (n = 4,224), adalimumab (n = 2,941), or infliximab (n = 1,289). Treatment patterns in the first year across all four conditions combined for etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab, respectively, were: persistence, 42%, 47%, and 56%; restarting, 25%, 19%, and 12%; switching, 13%, 12%, and 13%; and stopping, 20%, 22%, and 19%. The combined rates of either persistence or restarting initial therapy after a treatment gap were 67%, 66%, and 68%, for etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab, respectively. Most switches (66-92%) were between the three TNF blockers. In the first year after initiating TNF blocker therapy, patients often have a ≥45-day treatment gap; however, approximately two-thirds of patients are either persistent with or restart their index therapy in the year following TNF blocker initiation.

Highlights

  • Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers play an important role in the treatment of some autoimmune disorders by helping to regulate the body’s inflammatory processes and inhibiting progressive structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)

  • The study criteria were met in 8,454 patients who newly initiated TNF blocker treatment in the study period

  • Among patients with RA, PsO, PsA, and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), the mean (SD) age at baseline was 50 (10), 44 (11), 48 (10), and 43 (12) years, respectively, and 76%, 46%, 50%, and 40% of patients, respectively, were women

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers play an important role in the treatment of some autoimmune disorders by helping to regulate the body’s inflammatory processes and inhibiting progressive structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The most widely used TNF blockers are etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab Each of these TNF blockers is indicated for use in adults with the following conditions: moderately to severely active RA; chronic, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO); active PsA; and active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)blockers are approved for use in several immunerelated conditions, but treatment patterns, such as switching between TNF blockers or restarting treatment after a gap in therapy, are not clearly established. This analysis examined TNF blocker treatment patterns within the first year after initiating treatment with etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call