Abstract
Over the last 15 years the treatment of ureteral stones has been considerably revolutionised thanks to new, less invasive technologies compared to traditional surgery. The urologist is, however, faced with a dilemma: whether to cure the patient with easy-to-perform extracorporeal lithotripsy (ESWL) without anesthesia in Day Surgery, but which often requires more than one session to clear the stones completely, or to carry out ureteroscopy and intracorporeal lithotripsy, which resolves most cases in just one treatment but is more invasive in that it requires general anesthesia and hospitalisation. The authors present their experience and compare the two methods.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
