Abstract

ObjectiveThis retrospective study compared the effectiveness of dispersed implantation of very small autologous columnar skin (SCS) grafts and full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) for treating upper eyelid third-degree burns. MethodsFourteen patients and 26 eyes with granulation tissue formed by third-degree upper eyelid burns were enrolled in the study from August 2017 to June 2020. The experimental group of 6 patients with 11 eyes was treated with SCS grafts. The control group of 8 patients with 15 eyes was treated with FTSGs. The survival rate of the grafts, healing time, SCS diameter, upper eyelid movement distance (ULMD), visual analogue scale (VAS) score for patient satisfaction, and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score were evaluated. ResultsThe difference in the survival rate between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.06). The ULMD and VAS scores in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The healing time was longer in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The VSS scores of the donor site and the skin grafting site in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). ConclusionUnlike classical skin grafts, SCS implantation surgery can restore the appearance of the upper eyelid, and there is no obvious scar at the donor site. This can be a viable alternative to traditional FTSGs with potential benefits

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call