Abstract

Among operational risk practitioners there is some confusion about the implications of the loss data collection threshold and the estimation of or distributions. Claims that models result in biased parameter estimates rely on the premise that the true model is known to be and do not objectively evaluate distributions. We systematically analyze the performance of and lognormal models and illustrate the use of Vuong's LR test for model selection. We conclude that truncated and shifted lognormal models are equally valid or invalid approaches for estimating loss severity with a data collection threshold.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call