Abstract

ABSTRACTExploring generalisation following treatment of language deficits in aphasia can provide insights into the functional relation of the cognitive processing systems involved. In the present study, we first review treatment outcomes of interventions targeting sentence processing deficits and, second report a treatment study examining the occurrence of practice effects and generalisation in sentence comprehension and production. In order to explore the potential linkage between processing systems involved in comprehending and producing sentences, we investigated whether improvements generalise within (i.e., uni-modal generalisation in comprehension or in production) and/or across modalities (i.e., cross-modal generalisation from comprehension to production or vice versa). Two individuals with aphasia displaying co-occurring deficits in sentence comprehension and production were trained on complex, non-canonical sentences in both modalities. Two evidence-based treatment protocols were applied in a crossover intervention study with sequence of treatment phases being randomly allocated. Both participants benefited significantly from treatment, leading to uni-modal generalisation in both comprehension and production. However, cross-modal generalisation did not occur. The magnitude of uni-modal generalisation in sentence production was related to participants’ sentence comprehension performance prior to treatment. These findings support the assumption of modality-specific sub-systems for sentence comprehension and production, being linked uni-directionally from comprehension to production.

Highlights

  • Many individuals with aphasia (IWA), those with Broca’s aphasia, experience difficulties in sentence processing (e.g., Caramazza & Zurif, 1976; Mitchum & Berndt, 2008)

  • In order to explore the potential linkage between processing systems involved in comprehending and producing sentences, we investigated whether improvements generalise within and/or across modalities

  • Object relative clauses (ORC) were trained in two subsequent treatment phases, each targeting a single modality, and several treatment outcomes were investigated using a crossover design (Coltheart, 1991). With respect to these treatment effects, we addressed the following questions and hypotheses: (1) Uni-modal treatment effects: Do practice effects and generalisation occur within the treated modality? Generalisation is assessed for (a) untrained exemplars of the trained sentence type (ORC) and (b) untrained sentence types

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many individuals with aphasia (IWA), those with Broca’s aphasia, experience difficulties in sentence processing (e.g., Caramazza & Zurif, 1976; Mitchum & Berndt, 2008). IWA may show associated deficits, depicting sentence processing deficits in both sentence comprehension and production, performance may dissociate between these two modalities (e.g., Caplan & Futter, 1986; Caramazza & Hillis, 1989; Caramazza & Miceli, 1991; Luzzatti et al, 2001; Martin & Blossom-Stach, 1986; Miceli, Mazzucchi, Menn, & Goodglass, 1983; Nespoulous et al, 1988; Schröder, Burchert, & Stadie, 2015). These cases of associated and dissociated deficits of comprehension and production form some of the data against which the question of syntactic processing components is assessed: Is there a single syntactic processing system shared by comprehension and production or does each modality draw back onto a modality-specific syntactic processing system, which can be selectively impaired (Caramazza & Hillis, 1989)?

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call