Abstract

Selective mutism (SM) has been defined as an anxiety disorder in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the recommended approach for SM, but prospective long-term outcome studies are lacking. Reports from the children themselves, and the use of more global quality of life measures, are also missing in the literature. We have developed a school-based CBT intervention previously found to increase speech in a pilot efficacy study and a randomized controlled treatment study. Continued progress was found in our 1-year follow-up studies, where older age and more severe SM had a significant negative effect upon outcome. In the present study, we provide 5-year outcome data for 30 of these 32 children with SM who completed the same CBT for mean 21 weeks (sd 5, range 8–24) at mean age 6 years (10 boys). Mean age at the 5-year follow-up was 11 years (range 8–14). Outcome measures were diagnostic status, the teacher- and parent-rated selective mutism questionnaires, and child rated quality of life and speaking behavior. At the 5-year follow-up, 21 children were in full remission, five were in partial remission and four fulfilled diagnostic criteria for SM. Seven children (23%) fulfilled criteria for social phobia, and separation anxiety disorder, specific phobia and/or enuresis nocturna were found in a total of five children (17%). Older age and severity at baseline and familial SM were significant negative predictors of outcome. Treatment gains were maintained on the teacher- and parent questionnaires. The children rated their overall quality of life as good. Although most of them talked outside of home, 50% still experienced it as somewhat challenging. These results point to the long-term effectiveness of CBT for SM, but also highlight the need to develop more effective interventions for the subset of children with persistent symptoms.Clinical trials registration NCT01002196

Highlights

  • Selective mutism (SM) is characterized by a consistent lack of speech in specific social situations in which there is an expectation for speaking despite speaking in other situations [1, 2]

  • To obtain some form of child report we asked the children to rate their difficulties with speaking at school/outside home on a Likert scale, corresponding to the 1–5 range on the in Children and Adolescents (ILC), especially adapted by the authors for the present study (1 = very easy, through 3 = mixed), to 5 = very difficult)

  • Based on the diagnostic categories of SM, we found a more prominent improvement in the younger children, as 14 of the 16 children (88%) aged 3–5 years at inclusion were in full remission at the 5-year follow-up, compared with seven of the 14 children (50%), aged 6–9 years at inclusion (χ2 square 4.99, df = 1, p = 0.03)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Selective mutism (SM) is characterized by a consistent lack of speech in specific social situations in which there is an expectation for speaking (e.g., school) despite speaking in other situations (e.g., at home) [1, 2]. SM is reported to run in families, and a family history study of 38 children with SM reported a clear excess of the personality trait of taciturnity in 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-degree relatives, underlining the importance of the familial background for outcome studies [13]. Support for a familial relationship between social phobia and SM was found in parents to children with SM [14]. Due to the gradual shift in the understanding of SM from an act of will to an anxiety-based avoidance of speaking in specific situations, SM was classified as an anxiety disorder in the fifth edition of Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) [2]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.