Abstract

BackgroundAcute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a highly curable disease when treated with all-trans retinoid acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO). The combination of ATO and ATRA has become the standard therapeutic protocol for induction therapy in non-high-risk APL. An oral arsenic realgar-indigo naturalis formula (RIF) has also showed high efficacy and it has a more convenient route of administration than the standard intravenous regimen. Unlike in previous trials, the arsenical agent was used simultaneously with ATRA during post-remission therapy in this trial.MethodsThis study was designed as a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. The trial has a non-inferiority design with superiority being explored if non-inferiority is identified. All patients receive ATRA-ATO during the induction therapy. After achieving hematologic complete remission (HCR), patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive treatment with ATRA-RIF (experimental group) or ATRA-ATO (control group) as the consolidation therapy. During the consolidation therapy, the two groups receive ATRA plus RIF or intravenous ATO 2 weeks on and 2 to ~ 4 weeks off until molecular complete remission (MCR), then ATRA and oral RIF 2 weeks on and 2 to ~ 4 weeks off giving a total of six courses.DiscussionThis trial aims to compare the efficacy of ATRA-ATO versus ATRA-RIF in non-high-risk patients with APL, to demonstrate that oral RIF application reduces the total hospitalization days and medical costs. The simple schedule was studied in this trial.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02899169. Registered on 14 September 2016.

Highlights

  • Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a highly curable disease when treated with all-trans retinoid acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO)

  • The simultaneous application of oral realgar-indigo naturalis formula (RIF) and ATRA is more convenient for patients and improves the efficacy

  • The APL0406 study showed the advantages of ATRA-ATO over ATRA-CHT in nonhigh-risk APL

Read more

Summary

Methods

Study hypothesis The hypothesis is that ATRA-RIF is not inferior to ATOATRA in treating non-high-risk APL. Inclusion criteria Participants meeting the following criteria will be included: Age 14–75 years Newly diagnosed APL with t (15; 17) (q22; q12) Pre-treatment peripheral blood white blood cell (WBC) count < 10 × 109/L Able to complete the entire treatment process Signed written informed consent provided by the patient or their family. Randomization Treatment allocation occurs when the study participant meets the inclusion criteria and signs the informed consent form. Participants are allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the two arms of the study according to a computer-generated random sequence after achieving hematologic complete remission (HCR) Participants will be informed of their allocated treatment group following randomization. The medical costs will be retrospectively calculated for the patients involved in a prospective randomized controlled trial and will be compared in a post hoc analysis of the two groups.

Discussion
Background
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call