Abstract
In this study different substitution methods for the replacement of missing data values were inspected for the use of these cases in a neural network based decision support system for acute appendicitis. The leucocyte count had the greatest number of missing values and was used in the analyses. Four different methods were compared: substituting means, random values, nearest neighbour and a neural network. There were great differences in the substituted leucocyte count values between different methods and only nearest neighbour and neural network agreed about most of the cases. The importance of the substitution method for the final diagnostic classification of the patients by the neural network based decision support system was found to be small.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
